![]() In Rhineland-Palatinate, the Ahrweiler district is the focus of the disaster. The responsible district administrator, Frank Rock, said on the television channel n-tv that 50 people had been rescued by boats.Īccording to the Federal Office for Population and Disaster Management (BBK) in Bonn, 23 cities and districts are affected by floods in North Rhine-Westphalia. It was unclear how many victims there were. With water levels falling in some places and less rain, there were signs of some relaxation.Ī particularly dramatic situation arose on Friday in Erftstadt-Blessem southwest of Cologne: There were huge landslides there, and craters formed in the ground.Īs of Friday evening, three houses and part of the historic castle collapsed. In the flooded areas, the rescue and clean-up work continued on Friday. In both federal states, many people were also missing, their exact number is unclear. In some places of the devastating flood, the water is slowly receding - but the death toll is still rising.Īnd the danger is not over after the flood disaster in the west of the Federal Republic.Ī total of 106 fatalities were counted by Friday evening - according to official information, at least 63 people were killed in Rhineland-Palatinate and 43 in North Rhine-Westphalia. : Saúl Luciano Lliuya files the lawsuit, which is classified by the District Court Essen as "a legal matter with fundamental significance".Hagen: Bundeswehr soldiers help with a Dachs engineer tank June 2016: In its statement of defence, RWE disputes its own responsibility for climate change induced damage in the Andes and denies that Huaraz even faces a risk of flooding. : The first oral hearing takes place amid great national and international interest – the decision was adjourned. : The District Court Essen dismisses the civil lawsuit against RWE. : Saúl Luciano Lliuya files an appeal before the Higher Regional Court Hamm against the negative ruling of the Regional Court Essen. : The appeal at the Higher District Court Hamm is scheduled as an oral hearing. : The Higher Regional Court Hamm announces its decision to enter into the evidentiary stage thereby writing legal history. and : The Higher Regional Court of Hamm clearly rejects two statements of objection filed by RWE’s lawyers against the Court’s Order for the Hearing of Evidence and states once again: climate damages can give rise to corporate liability. ![]() ![]() July 2018: Since plaintiff and defendant cannot agree on experts for the taking of evidence, the Higher Regional Court of Hamm announces that it will select them itself. If this question is answered positively, there will be taking of evidence with regards to the defendant‘s part of responsibility for this impairment due to RWE‘s CO₂ emissions. They will provide an opinion on the question of wether or not there is a serious threat of impairment to the plaintiff‘s property. ![]() September 2018: The experts selected by the Higher Regional Court of Hamm accept their appointment. The Court is at present awaiting response from the competent authorities, which can take quite some time to process. Judges of the Higher Regional Court (OLG) of Hamm, legal advisors and experts travelled to Peru to check whether the plaintiff's house is actually threatened by a possible flood wave from the Palcacocha glacial lake above the city.Ģ020: Unfortunately, the taking of evidence in Huaraz will be further delayed due to the Corona-crisis and resulting travel restrictions.Ģ019: On the recommendation of the experts, the Higher Regional Court of Hamm has made a request to the State of Peru to be allowed to inspect the premises that are the subject of the lawsuit. 2022: After a long delay, the court hearing in the Andean city of Huaraz took place in May.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |